Difference between revisions of "Portal:2003 Spring Men/Intro"

From USAFA Rugby Alumni
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
National Champions!  (posting the first win over Cal Berkeley in 8 previous Air Force losses since 1969).  Coach Holder had tried to model the way we played tournaments off of Cal. They would always start essentially a B side on the first day and then their A was fresh on the second day (against in theory the better opponent). We did the same all year, building up great depth and keeping guys fresh. Unfortunately though, we drew Cal in the Semi’s so of course we had to start our A’s on Saturday but they still started their B's.  We scored in the first two minutes and never looked back. In th finals, Harvard was an upstart (15 seed), so Coach Holder rewarded the B side and started them in the Finals. It ended up a little close for comfort, so many of the A's were in by the end of the game, but was a great full team effort all year.
+
[[File:usafaRugbyPatch3.png | x100px|thumb|left| Team patch]][[File:usafaAlumniPatch6.jpeg | x50px|thumb|left|Team logo]] [[File:2003 to 2005 men jerseys.jpg| x100px|thumb| Team Jersey]]'''National Champions!''' (posting the first win over Cal Berkeley after 8 previous Air Force losses since 1969).  Coach Holder had tried to model the way we played tournaments off of Cal. They would always start essentially a B side on the first day and then their A was fresh on the second day (against in theory the better opponent). We did the same all year, building up great depth and keeping guys fresh. Unfortunately though, we drew Cal in the Semi’s so of course we had to start our A’s on Saturday but they still started some of their B's.  We scored in the first two minutes and never looked back. By the 20th minute, they quickly substituted in all their top players.
  
 +
In the finals, Harvard was an upstart (15 seed), so Coach Holder rewarded the B side and started them in the Finals. It ended up a little close for comfort, so many of the A's were in by the end of the game, but was a great full team effort all year.
  
Here are some documents that paint that picture!:
+
Cal was so mad that they beat Army by around 75 points in the consolation 3/4 game and Coach Clark discredited the concept of having the consolation game.  It was the last consolation game played.
  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgOLVmYY9UQ
+
Here are some documents that paint that picture:  '''From Cal point of view''' [http://www.sfgate.com/sports/article/Cal-stunned-in-rugby-semis-Air-Force-to-face-2650890.php], or [http://www.calbears.com/news/2003/5/4/207735144.aspx], From the Harvard point of view [http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/5/5/m-rugby-finishes-second-at-nationals/]
  
http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/139246/academy-rugby-teams-win-championships.aspx
+
'''Summary''' [http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/139246/academy-rugby-teams-win-championships.aspx], '''Video of the first 20 minutes''' [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgOLVmYY9UQ], '''Marc Ward's story''' [http://www.afpc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123201120]
 
 
http://www.afpc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123201120
 
 
 
http://www.erugbynews.com/goffonrugby/archive/Articles/menscollege050503.htm
 
 
 
www.erugbynews.com/goffonrugby/archive/Articles/0503.htm
 

Latest revision as of 02:12, 13 April 2023

Team patch
Team logo
Team Jersey

National Champions! (posting the first win over Cal Berkeley after 8 previous Air Force losses since 1969). Coach Holder had tried to model the way we played tournaments off of Cal. They would always start essentially a B side on the first day and then their A was fresh on the second day (against in theory the better opponent). We did the same all year, building up great depth and keeping guys fresh. Unfortunately though, we drew Cal in the Semi’s so of course we had to start our A’s on Saturday but they still started some of their B's. We scored in the first two minutes and never looked back. By the 20th minute, they quickly substituted in all their top players.

In the finals, Harvard was an upstart (15 seed), so Coach Holder rewarded the B side and started them in the Finals. It ended up a little close for comfort, so many of the A's were in by the end of the game, but was a great full team effort all year.

Cal was so mad that they beat Army by around 75 points in the consolation 3/4 game and Coach Clark discredited the concept of having the consolation game. It was the last consolation game played.

Here are some documents that paint that picture: From Cal point of view [1], or [2], From the Harvard point of view [3]

Summary [4], Video of the first 20 minutes [5], Marc Ward's story [6]